{"id":9910,"date":"2023-03-29T20:59:12","date_gmt":"2023-03-29T20:59:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/9thstreetjournal.org\/?p=9910"},"modified":"2023-03-29T20:59:12","modified_gmt":"2023-03-29T20:59:12","slug":"talking-vinyl-with-the-historic-preservation-commission","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/9thstreetjournal.org\/2023\/03\/29\/talking-vinyl-with-the-historic-preservation-commission\/","title":{"rendered":"Talking vinyl with the Historic Preservation Commission"},"content":{"rendered":"
When a Durham commission discussed the mundane details for a new clubhouse \u2014 including whether it could have vinyl window frames \u2014 the real focus was on an old house at the top of a nearby hill. That house, the Greystone Inn, is listed in the National Register of Historic Places, and is included in the local Morehead Hill Historic District. Under a Durham ordinance, any time someone wants to build within a local historic district, they need a \u201ccertificate of appropriateness.\u201d Enter the Durham Historic Preservation Commission.<\/span><\/p>\n The commission must approve proposed changes to make sure they match the character of nearby historic buildings.<\/span><\/p>\n In early March, at the group\u2019s most recent meeting, members discussed plans for a vacant lot down the hill from the Inn.<\/span><\/p>\n \u201cOur job is to protect the historic character of our communities as a way of providing some education about the story of that community,\u201d commission member April Johnson, 44, director of community engagement and giving at Housing for New Hope, told The 9th Street Journal.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n The proposed project for the lot, the Elm Hill Townhomes, first appeared before the commission two years ago. The plan included 11 residential buildings and a clubhouse. After ensuring that everything from the buildings\u2019 siding to the trees on the property posed no threat to the Greystone Inn\u2019s architectural character, the board unanimously approved the project.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n But there were additional details to fret about, so the project was back on the March 7 agenda. It was a reminder of how the Historic Preservation Commission worries about little things: The meeting focused solely on a request to add an extra floor to the clubhouse, which led to discussions about shingles, window models, and landscaping.<\/span><\/p>\n The commission assembled in a small committee room at City Hall at 9 a.m., and Chair Andy Goolsby called the meeting to order.<\/span><\/p>\n After roll call, the group turned to the main item on the agenda: the vacant lot.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Linda Lavis, the project manager, rose to present the amended clubhouse plan. She scrolled through a presentation, explaining the front and side views of the two-story building. Lavis discussed the materials (insulated wood doors, cement trim, board and batten siding) and listed the building\u2019s potential spaces (fitness room, yoga studio, offices). After five minutes and more than 10 pages of drawings, Lavis said, \u201cThat\u2019s the extent of it. It\u2019s a pretty small, simple building.\u201d\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Simple, sure. But the commission had no shortage of detailed questions.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n First, Gooslby clarified the kind of asphalt shingles on the clubhouse roof. Lavis handled that one easily, but the next question caused more of a stir.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n