{"id":4618,"date":"2020-11-13T10:25:28","date_gmt":"2020-11-13T10:25:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/9thstreetjournal.org\/?p=4618"},"modified":"2023-08-16T16:09:11","modified_gmt":"2023-08-16T16:09:11","slug":"analysis-1-million-mail-in-ballots-not-many-problems","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/9thstreetjournal.org\/2020\/11\/13\/analysis-1-million-mail-in-ballots-not-many-problems\/","title":{"rendered":"Analysis: 1 million mail-in ballots, not many problems"},"content":{"rendered":"
After months of concerns about Postal Service delays, unfounded allegations about ballot fraud and worries that mail-in ballot deficiencies would disenfranchise voters, the 2020 election has <\/span>mostly<\/span><\/a> put the mail-in voting frenzy to rest \u2013 at least in North Carolina.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Even so, mail-in voting had its challenges. Processing <\/span>1,001,300<\/span><\/a> mail-in ballots required unprecedented resources.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n \u201cIt was no small feat, but I am pleased to report that the election administration process in North Carolina went very well,\u201d Damon Circosta, chair of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, said in an email to The 9th Street Journal.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n The \u201cno small feat\u201d that Circosta referred to involves the 1,001,300 absentee-by-mail ballots cast in the battleground state as of Thursday, Nov. 12. Election officials counted mail-in ballots that were postmarked by Election Day and received by Thursday.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Tens of thousands of ballots were still counted as outstanding ballots this week, meaning\u00a0 ballots that were requested but not yet returned. It is unlikely that the state board will receive all of them because some people ultimately chose to vote at the polls or not to cast a ballot.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Another uncertainty: lots of lawsuits. They challenged various aspects of the state rules and demanded changes in the mail-in voting process. In one, for example, the <\/span>North Carolina Alliance for Retired Americans<\/span><\/a> asked that the North Carolina Supreme Court suspend the witness requirement for single-adult households, among other changes.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n While the state board initially agreed to let voters fix missing witness signatures with an affidavit, Republican leaders resisted. That triggered a back and forth, which finally ended with an Oct. 18 decision that voters who submitted a ballot with missing witness information must <\/span>cast a new vote<\/span><\/a>.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n