that deploys mental health clinicians to help respond to 911 calls. \u201cShotSpotter does not.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\nKing Sage, a resident of East Durham, where the technology was tried, said ShotSpotter is a bad use of Durham\u2019s resources. \u201cI never once heard my neighbors seriously say that we needed more policing and surveillance,\u201d said Sage.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nBrittney Price, who lives a couple blocks north of a ShotSpotter sensor, told the council of the time she lost a loved one to gun violence, when she was living in a different city. The gunshots that killed him were picked up by ShotSpotter but dismissed as not being gun fire, she said.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nGenerally, the conversation centered around whether ShotSpotter effectively addresses the issue of gun violence and whether its implementation results in heightened policing in communities, potentially exposing them to greater risks.<\/span><\/p>\nWhen it was time for the council members to vote, the numbers mimicked exactly what happened last December: a 4-2 vote, with Middleton and Williams voting yes, and the other four council members voting no.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nChelsea Cook, who was recently appointed to City Council, found the data in the recent study uncompelling. \u201cOnly two<\/span> confirmed shots with wounds were ShotSpotter-only calls,\u201d said Cook. In the more than 90\u00a0 remaining instances, incidents reported by ShotSpotter were also reported by 911 calls, she said. To Cook, that duplication suggested a lack of necessity for this expensive program.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\u201cThis is not the right technology for Durham, I will not be supporting it tonight,\u201d said Cook.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nAlso voting no were council members Nate Baker and Carl Rist. Baker cited data from the Wilson Center report.\u00a0 Rist found the results from the recent report inconclusive and noted the skepticism expressed by Durham residents.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nBy contrast, council member Mark-Anthony Middleton has firmly supported ShotSpotter since its arrival in Durham.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nHe wanted to talk about North Carolina Central University, where scholars hoped to try the technology. Middleton addressed the comparison between the HEART program and ShotSpotter, saying they can absolutely co-exist, and HEART should not be used as an alternative to ShotSpotter.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\u201cThey are two totally different lanes,\u201d said Middleton.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nCouncil member Javiera Caballero said Durham should be careful in how it allocates its resources.<\/span><\/p>\n\u201cWe don\u2019t have a money tree,\u201d said Caballero.\u201cI said no in 2019, I said no when it came up in 2022 for a vote, and I said no this evening.\u201d\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nFinally, it was Williams\u2019 turn. He called up Chief of Police Patrice Andrews, adding that when he was a teacher, he hated when school board members, not teachers, made the decisions.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\u201cNone of us are police officers,\u201d said Williams.<\/span><\/p>\n\u00a0“Any amount of time reduction is a positive thing,\u201d the chief said.<\/span> \u201cShotSpotter is a tool\u2026. It\u2019s just one more tool in our whole repertoire of investigative tools and resources that we have.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\nThough Williams and Middleton voted in favor, a 4-2 vote brought ShotSpotter to the ground once again. Durham will not be seeing this technology in its streets for the foreseeable future.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"In a contentious vote Monday night, the City Council voted against re-implementing ShotSpotter in Durham.\u00a0 ShotSpotter, which uses acoustic sensors to detect gunshots and notify…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":76,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[12,14],"tags":[58,75],"class_list":["post-11688","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-local-government","category-public-safety","tag-city-council","tag-crime","entry"],"yoast_head":"\n
Council shoots down ShotSpotter \u2014\u00a0again - 9th Street Journal<\/title>\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n