{"id":1153,"date":"2019-09-12T14:34:37","date_gmt":"2019-09-12T14:34:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/9thstreetjournal.org\/?p=1153"},"modified":"2024-03-18T16:55:44","modified_gmt":"2024-03-18T16:55:44","slug":"at-bishop-hearing-lawyers-spar-over-search-warrants","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/9thstreetjournal.org\/2019\/09\/12\/at-bishop-hearing-lawyers-spar-over-search-warrants\/","title":{"rendered":"At Bishop hearing, lawyers spar over search warrants"},"content":{"rendered":"
The second day of a hearing in the case of Alexander Bishop, a 17-year-old boy accused of killing his father with a dog leash, was a battle over search warrants.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Prosecutors and Bishop\u2019s attorney sparred over the warrants and the evidence they provided, accusing each other of “fishing expeditions.” <\/span><\/p>\n
Allyn Sharp, Bishop\u2019s attorney, said some evidence should be suppressed because of misconduct by the lead investigator, Tony Huelsman.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
But prosecutor Beth Hopkins Thomas said there was no proof Huelsman was intentionally misleading when he sought the warrants.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\u201cThe claims here are incredibly opaque and getting into semantics instead of getting into substantive material issues,\u201d Hopkins Thomas said of Sharp\u2019s arguments.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Late in the day, Sharp noted that Huelsman had executed about 22 search warrants and asked him to explain what criminal evidence he’d uncovered.<\/span><\/p>\n
Hopkins Thomas was quick to object.<\/span><\/p>\n
“Your honor, it’s a fishing expedition,” Hopkins Thomas said. “She is trying to get our lead investigator to lay out his entire testimony before the trial.”<\/p>\n